As the global financial landscape continues to evolve, China's major state-owned banks are at the forefront of a significant transformationBy the end of the third quarter of 2024, the average core Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio for these banks stood at an impressive 12.46%. This was accompanied by a Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio of 14.11% and a total capital ratio of 18.3%. These figures represent a substantial increase when compared to the end of 2023, with improvements of 49 basis points, 44 basis points, and 81 basis points, respectivelySuch advancements indicate not only the strengthening of capital structures within these financial institutions but also the extensive capital injection plans in place.

The Financial Stability Board (FSB) has been publishing a list of Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) since 2011. This year, the list features five of China’s largest state-owned banks: Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC), Bank of China (BOC), Agricultural Bank of China (ABC), China Construction Bank (CCB), and Bank of Communications (BoCom). These banks are evaluated based on their scale, interconnectedness, substitutability, financial infrastructure, and complexity, with each dimension weighted equally

Advertisements

Such assessments are crucial as they provide insights into the relative safety and stability of banks on a global scale.

Notably, eight Chinese banks were included in the analysis for the G-SIB list, with five making it into the categorized groupingICBC, ABC, BOC, CCB reaffirmed their positions within the second tier, maintaining their status from the previous yearOn the other hand, BoCom, which entered the G-SIB rankings the previous year, has now been elevated to the first tier.

The regulatory framework surrounding total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) is set to be fully implemented by 2025 for the world’s G-SIBs, with BoCom having a slightly extended deadline of early 2027. The phased implementation will see banks required to maintain TLAC ratios of no less than 16% for risk-weighted assets and 6% for leverage starting January 1, 2025. As of January 2028, these standards will further tighten to 18% for TLAC risk-weighted ratios and 6.75% for leverage ratios

Advertisements

New entrants to the G-SIB category, such as BoCom, will have a three-year grace period from their designation date to meet these requirements.

Reflecting on the TLAC bond issuance landscape, it is important to highlight that all Chinese G-SIBs have successfully completed their initial rounds of TLAC bond releasesFor 2024, the banks have ambitious plans, with proposed TLAC bond limits totaling 440 billion yuan across the five aforementioned institutionsThis proactive approach not only enhances their capital buffers but also provides a substantial buffer against market volatility.

Moreover, the slowdown in the growth of risk-weighted assets (RWAs) has been beneficial for meeting TLAC requirementsIn 2024, regulatory adjustments have decreased pressures on banks concerning their sizeConsequently, a combination of factors has led to a decrease in risk asset growth rates, which fell to an average of 2.19% by the end of Q3 2024 — a drop of 9.17 percentage points from the previous year’s end.

With these recent developments, the capital adequacy ratios for China's state-owned banks are not just merely meeting regulatory requirements; they are exceeding them, paving the way for necessary capital injections

Advertisements

The regulatory agencies have initiated plans specifically aimed at enhancing the core Tier 1 capital of large state banks, with a proposal to issue special government bonds to support these aimsThis is particularly significant, marking the re-introduction of a mechanism that had previously facilitated a substantial capital injection into domestic banks in the late 1990s.

As the Ministry of Finance waits for banks to submit their specific capital enhancement strategies, discussions abound regarding the potential impacts of these liquidity infusionsAnalysts have modeled scenarios in which the size of capital injections could reach around one trillion yuanThey evaluate the effects of varying capital ratios on return on equity (ROE), notably projecting minor declines across several banks due to dilution resulting from capital increases.

In scrutinizing the implications of different price-to-book (PB) ratios on earnings per share (EPS) and dividend yields, estimates suggest noticeable but manageable effects

• Financial Services Go Digital: Trends and Challenges
• Fed Cuts Rates, Dow Plunges 1,000 Points
• Can AI Drive Future Economic Growth?
• NVIDIA Market Valuation Surpasses $1 Trillion
• Is $1 Trillion About to Flow Back to A-Share Markets?

In scenarios where the PB equals one, the range of dilution in EPS could be between 0.04 and 0.17 yuan, while the impact on dividend yields might range between 1.64% and 2.59%. Adjustments based on PB ratios of 0.8 and current market prices yield slightly differing, yet similarly gentle, effects on these financial indicators.

Overall, the findings suggest that while China's G-SIBs are well-positioned from a capital adequacy standpoint relative to regulatory requirements and peers in the U.S., the urgency for immediate capital reinforcements appears limitedLooking ahead, banks that did not make the G-SIB list remain at a disadvantage concerning size metrics but are on trajectories of improvement that may see them joining the ranks in the future.

In conclusion, the landscape of G-SIBs in China reveals a commitment to not only maintaining robust capital positions but also enhancing their capacity for financial stability and risk absorption in the face of evolving regulations and market conditions